Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Your Rental Home Wants You to Wait Until It’s Ready

Every client we’ve ever had has wanted as little vacancy time for their rental as possible. Zero days are optimal; every day after zero winds up costing them money in utilities, mortgage payments, and maintenance. Not wanting to lose any money leads to a mentality of getting the home on the market as soon as possible, regardless of condition and resident situation.




So some clients want us to put their homes on the market prior to them being ready for occupancy. What I mean by this is that the home has not been completely repaired and there are still personal items in the house. They (or their current tenants) also are within the process of moving.



The rationale, by itself, is sound. The greater the length of time the house is on the market, the greater amount of potential tenants that can see it. If more potential renters see it, the law of large numbers would dictate that someone at some point would love it and want it.



However, does this really work? I would argue it doesn’t. Huh? Why’s that? Isn’t it common sense?



Simply, the American consumer’s mind works differently now. There is an inundation of information being flung at them on a constant basis. Most of it is ignored; however, there are some marketing messages that get through (like a rental listing). If the consumer takes the time and makes an inquiry to visit the property, there is typically one shot to get them. Their attention span is limited.



This one shot means that the house has to look perfect. This visit needs to conclude with the prospective tenant loving the house. If they see or feel something they don’t like, it will probably turn them off and they will want to find another home. And there are many other rental houses on the market that look very similar. The competition is fierce!



So why does this matter? Maybe the diamonds in the rough that aren’t turned off by the home’s uncleanliness will be unearthed and they’ll take it. It’s certainly possible. But are renters who don’t care about the condition of the home desirable? If so, there may be disappointment when move-out time arrives and the home doesn’t look so great. Clean people typically want clean homes.



The other main reason is that once the marketing of the property begins, momentum is started. The rental is on the top of all the searches from rental websites, people who are waiting for a rental are told about it by their property managers, and it is fresh. This is when things typically happen for an average rental home- the first two weeks. Interested calls, inquiring e-mails, and subsequent showings come quickly. They need to be harnessed and converted into applications and security deposits.



But when the rental house isn’t up to the task, momentum is stunted. Interested, potential renters see the property in less than ideal shape and compare it to better kept homes on the market. The home loses out. Or the current tenant in the home is packing boxes to move and glares at the renter who is interrupting their evening after work. The house looks horrible and the vibe is bad. Potential renters flee to the next home. Can you blame them?



With rental homes, it’s more about quality time on the market and less about total time. Make sure the rental home is ready and most inviting when the most people want to look at it!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: 3 Approaches to Fixing Up a Rental Home

We sometimes take over management of homes that have been treated in, diplomatically-speaking, less than desired regard. It’s frustrating for the owners (and the property management company), especially in difficult economic times when cash is scarce.




The purpose of this article is not to talk about the root cause of this destruction (usually poor tenant screening), but rather the options available when faced with a rental home in bad shape.



It comes down to 3 potential approaches:



1. Total Fix-Up: This is when everything is fixed so the home is in tip-top shape. New carpet, new paint, new everything! The upside to this approach is that the home will command top rent and a top tenant, while the downside is that it will demand top dollar to be spent by the owner. ROI on a 1-year rental with this approach is debatable.



2. Partial Fix-Up: This is when the most pressing demands of the house are met. The house is cleaned well, the walls are touched up with paint, and the carpet is steam-cleaned. The goal is to make the house look like a good rental, not a show home. The upside to this approach is that it is much less expensive and will entice a good renter, while the downside is that it will not command top rent and the tenant will usually not be a neat-freak (we love neat freaks!!).



3. No Fix-Up: This is when the home goes to market “as is.” Little to nothing is done to fix the home aesthetically and the tenant is asked to “have an open mind” and the property is listed as a “handyman’s special.” The upside to this approach is that repair costs are low and the home can be put on the market immediately. The downside is tough. Rents have to be lowered considerably, the quality of tenant suffers, and the house will be in even worse shape (think catastrophic) when the tenant moves out (evicted or otherwise).



So which is the best approach? The answer is the universal response in business school to any question- “it depends.” At different times and situations, each approach is appropriate. Many times this answer is dictated by finances. I mean, if you have no extra money, you are forced to use approach #3, right? And if your rental home has gotten to the point that it is absolutely disgusting, you probably have to opt for approach #1 at some point.



Generally-speaking, I’m a fan of approach #2. I try to stretch #2 as long as possible before I’m faced with the decision that the house has to go to approach #1 (or #3). Once I’m at that point, my preference is approach #1 (if finances allow).



The approach chosen for home fix-ups is a huge component on their ROI. One size does not fit all (as some are wont to do). Choose carefully (and profitably!)!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)