Charlotte Property Management Monthly: Island of Misfit Toys Dilemma: Bernanke Says Rent-To-Own Can Save the Housing Market?

“Rent-to-own provisions, which would give existing tenants the option to purchase the home during their tenancies, might facilitate the transition of some renters back to the owner-occupied market. Such provisions may also reduce costs by encouraging renters to maintain their properties to a greater extent.”


(Ben Bernanke, US Federal Reserve Chairman)



I was interviewed recently about the rent-to-own home market (read article by clicking here) and what Bernanke said above. His assertion made a lot of sense to me. It led me to a flashback of the TV Christmas special, Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer, and the Island of Misfit Toys.



The Island of Misfit Toys was the dumping place for all of Santa’s broken and imperfect toys that his elves bungled. The toys did not fit the criteria of what the good kids wanted, so they were never delivered by Santa and were sent to the dreaded Island instead. It wasn’t the misfit toys fault; all they wanted was to be loved by children.



Then there were the poor children that didn’t receive any toys from Santa. They would have loved to have gotten these imperfect toys to play with and love. But no one knew how to make the exchange happen. The idea made a lot of sense (matching unloved, misfit toys up with poor kids that would love them), but the logistics plan was lacking.



It’s a similar situation in the current housing crisis. People are not able to buy homes, and in turn, people are not being able to sell their homes (it takes two to tango!). So wouldn’t it make sense to match up the two largest groups with the two largest needs in today’s housing market? They are:



1. “Wanna-Be Sellers” (WBS): “Could someone please bring a somewhat decent offer and buy my house??? Please?!?!? It has been on the market forever and I can’t reduce the cost any more! These payments are killing me and I’m looking at a short sale or foreclosure.” (Or “I have broken toys that the kids with money and credit don’t want!”)



2. “Wanna-Be Buyers” (WBB): “I would love to buy that house but I can’t get a loan due to my low credit scores and lack of a big down payment. Banks just won’t lend to me!” (Or “I have no toys, but want one to love!”)



So the head of the Fed brings up rent-to-own as a solution. Let the Wanna-Be Buyers (WBB) rent-to-own the Wanna-Be Sellers (WBS) homes (aka rent-to-sell). Walla! Problem solved! If the WBB pay their rent on time and in full for a year or two, they qualify for a loan in the house they are in. If they don’t, they move out of the house at the end of their lease and rent another home to live in.



So why is there still such a housing issue? Because “rent-to-own” and “rent-to-sell” are still largely being unutilized. But with such a large group of WBB and WBS out there, how can this be? Why aren’t real estate agents jumping on a chance to work with them?



Surprise! The two main reasons are related to money:



1. There is no loan program (that I know of) that gives low down payment and low credit score WBB a mortgage based on rental history. (No money to transport the toys)



2. Real estate agents don’t think there is enough money in it for the risk and headaches they think they are potentially taking on by transacting rent-to-own and rent-to-sell deals. (No manpower to find the toyless kids and deliver the toys to them)



The first reason could be solved with a government-sponsored loan program for renters. It would be based on landlord history. Yes, I know it would be open to fraud, but the smaller brush strokes would need to be worked out by people smarter than me.



The second issue is incenting the manpower to carry the mission out. Generally-speaking, real estate agent compensation is relatively simple. They help someone buy a house and get thousands of dollars. They help someone sell a house and get thousands of dollars in commissions.



But this rent-to-own thing? Placing WBB in homes typically only generates a nominal commission. For example, in Charlotte, 10% of the first full month’s rent is a common commission rate that is offered. So the math isn’t that great for real estate agents; for filling a house that rents for $1,000, they earn a commission of $100. At $4.00/gallon gas, that isn’t going very far. Then the agents must hope that their WBB purchase the home in a year or two so they can earn their much larger sales commissions. That is hard to keep track of, is uncertain to happen, and doesn’t pay the light bills today.



Hypothetically, if the commission structure was changed (augmented by the banks and government?), it would be interesting to see what would happen. If real estate agents received $3K for placing WBB into WBS homes, that would generate interest. Then if they were also given the selling commission if the WBB wound up buying the homes, that would make it even more enticing. I’d imagine that the WBB would be shown the WBS’ homes pretty quickly!



I believe this would also be a significant bargain for homeowners, banks, and the government (still holding tons of defaulting mortgages). It has the potential to stop the erosion of home values and become a true win-win-win-win-win for WBB, WBS, banks, real estate professionals, and our country’s neighborhoods. It would also create jobs and get money flowing into the housing sector.



The only thing missing is the financing for the renter loan program and commissions for the real estate agents. On the Island of Misfit Homes, it worked well because Santa and the elves worked for free on a handshake deal. In real life, we need the government and banks to step up with cash incentives and guarantees.



Filling vacant homes that aren’t selling (WBS) with renters who want to buy them (WBB) seems like the solution that worked on the Island of Misfit Toys. Is Bernanke ready to pay up to transport and deliver the toys?



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: “List to Last” Still True?

There are many sayings that become axioms as their wisdom becomes evident over time:




“Don’t throw good money after bad”






“The way to a man’s heart is through his stomach”






“Diamonds are a girl’s best friend”



In real estate, the wisdom for real estate agents was “list to last”; this means that the agents who want to last in the business should take a lot of sales listings (aka put houses on the market for sale). The rationale is that if an agent has a lot of houses on the market for sale or rent, it is probable that some of them will and they’ll make money.



Taking listings requires resources from agents. Agents need to take pictures, gather information, put the listing up on websites, take phone calls, and then pay for advertising. There is also the time expended fielding inquiries about the home, showing it to potential buyers, and giving status reports and tips to their seller clients. The more homes the agent has on the market for sale or rent, the more resources that are required.



And this isn’t a paid gig! The agents are working on faith that some of the houses will sell and they will be reimbursed for their expenses. Agents are putting themselves into position to be lucky. Fortunately, in the past, this usually worked out well.



Now, however, houses aren’t selling very swiftly. And more people than ever want to sell their homes. “List to Last” can be the fastest way to go broke. Agents that were salivating over the amount of listings they were personally accumulating are now singing a very different tune. Not only are they being sucked dry financially, the toll of anxious seller’s phone calls are sucking them dry psychologically.



“Why isn’t my home sold yet? You said you were different!”






“Why haven’t there been more showings? Why aren’t I seeing any offers?”



“Are you any good? How much money are you spending to advertise my property? You are just one of those agents who puts the home on MLS and then sits back to collect the commission, aren’t you?”



“List to (Not) Last” or “List to Leave (the Business)” may seem more apropos axioms. Amassing home listings that don’t move is both financially and mentally taxing. So what to do?



One word- Prequalify. In a world of limited resources, agents need to expend their resources judiciously. They need to know with a high degree of certainty that they can execute a transaction for a client. This is already commonly done by buyer agents who won’t show properties to clients who aren’t prequalified by a bank to purchase. This needs to be the norm on the sell side as well. That means not accepting every listing opportunity (gasp)!



Specialized firms do this everyday. Auction firms take listings that they know they can sell; if the client isn’t willing to (or can’t) take whatever offer that comes, they don’t expend their resources to put it on the block. It’s the same with short sale firms. If a client isn’t willing to let their credit get shredded, they typically won’t walk through the firm’s doors. Clients prequalify themselves.



General brokerage has a “come one, come all” message; prequalification of clients is done at the individual agent level. And, to have staying power in the real estate business, it’s important that it actually happens!



Listings are still vital to the business of real estate agents, but they need to be homes the agents know they can sell or rent. So, in the new normal, the axiom should read, “List (the Homes You Can Actually Transact) to Last!”



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Reaction to Proposed FHA Loan Changes for Those in Lease Option Contracts: “No Sweat”

There has been a lot of discussion surrounding proposed (and current) changes to tighten FHA loan guidelines. Heated discussions. Unhappy folks. Panic.




Real estate agents are unhappy. Buyers are unhappy. NAR is not happy. And if mommy isn’t happy, nobody is happy.



Why is this? Well, if more buyers are pushed out of the market for not having the proper qualifications now, the real estate market will continue to worsen. If that happens, who knows what the effect will be for the economy in general, and especially for those that are employed in the real estate industry.



It reminds me of one of my high school friend’s patented lines when he would see one of us wearing an ugly shirt or some God-awful hat, “I didn’t think there was a possible way for you to get even less girls, but you may have found it.”



To extend this wisdom to the real estate industry, if real estate agents didn’t think there was a possible way to do even less brokerage business, FHA may have found a way.



Don’t blame Congress; they don’t have much of a choice. They can’t responsibly sit idle while their GSE’s keep losing so much taxpayer money every quarter from loan losses. The choice is out of their hands.



The same is true with buyers and sellers in today’s market. If they go into contract on a home and the bank underwriters decide not to make the loan at the last minute, the buyer and seller have little choice: the buyer walks and the seller keeps the home on the market.



However, for those lease option buyers (rent-to-own) and sellers (rent-to-sell) under contract, there is a choice. No one has to walk; the lease contract can simply be extended until the lease option tenant qualifies for a loan. They can try to get a loan every month if they want. There is no panic, no one has to move, and the deal can still happen.



To further clarify, the lease option (rent-to-own) tenant is under a lease agreement and is paying the seller’s mortgage with their monthly rental payments. This lease can go on indefinitely (with mutual agreement, of course). As long as the tenant still wants to buy and the owner still wants to sell, no one is worried. It may take a little longer than both parties want, but the sale can still happen. This goes for any FHA closing issues such as low appraisals, increased down payment need, or higher credit score requirements.



Lease options provide greater flexibility to close deals in a changing lending environment. The lease can be extended and the terms renegotiated on the fly. Agreements can be salvaged and completed. Choice is a nice thing.



While others fret, lease option principals (including real estate agents) say “No Sweat.”



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)