Thursday, December 1, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Monthly: Incentives: Knowing Why the Chicken Crossed the Road & Why Fees are Good



Q. Why did the chicken cross the road?


A. There was bird feed there

B. A coyote was chasing him

C. He saw a hot “chick” on the median

D. To get to the other side



Answer D is the response that makes this a legendary “joke” (somehow…). Answer D is also very incomplete. Everything happens for a reason; no one does things without some type of incentive being involved. I mean, the chicken wouldn’t care about getting to the other side if he didn’t have a reason to do so. What was its motivation? What was the incentive the chicken was pursuing? A, B, or C answers make much more sense to me in answering the “why” question! They address the chicken’s needs:



A. Hunger

B. Safety

C. Love (or lust)



In business, incentives usually mean money. If 90%+ of businesses fail for lack of cash flow (lack of money incentives), then the ones that survive make sure they are getting enough cash incentives from their customers. Obviously, this isn’t a one way street; the businesses are offering enough value in return so these payments are a win-win deal.



So now that is established, what can incentives tell you about a company? Some charge for certain services, some don’t. Why not just take the free services when they’re offered? Cheaper, especially in tough economies, seems like the best way to go. Right?



Well, incentives can be telling; company pricing and their fees can tell you what they believe they do well and what they don’t. So, in terms of getting great results, paying fees can be very important! Fees motivate companies to do what you want them to do.



Reading into incentives (aka company pricing) is interesting and generally informative. Let’s look at examples of this from real estate and other businesses:



1. When a tech company sells pricy software and then offers free support with it, I’d expect the software to be good and the support to have long hold times. If support costs extra money monthly and can be cancelled at any time, the support will probably be pretty good.



2. If you ask a friend to pet sit Fluffy as a free favor to you, your friend will probably be late and leave early; unfortunately, most friends will do the minimum required! If you hire the most expensive pet sitter in town, chances are Fluffy will be treated like Benji on a movie set.



3. If property management companies don’t charge you to sell homes under management, they are probably not going to actively seek to sell your home to the tenant.



4. If you offer your real estate agent 7% commission, they will probably be incented to work harder to sell your home. Many people will try to get their agent down to 5%, which is a complete misread of how incentives work.



5. If a property management company charges a huge sign-up fee, but very little for procuring a tenant and managing the property, chances are they will be very motivated to sign you up. They may be less motivated to procure the tenant and manage the property.



Generally-speaking, incentives (pricing) are an effective measure of the value that will be received for different services. A $5 chocolate bar should be better than a $1 bar. If you offer to pay one friend $50 to mow your loan and ask another to do it for free, guess which one you will see firing up his push mower first in your front yard?



So fees are good for consumers! If you don’t make sure you are utilizing proper incentives for service providers, you’ll never know when (or if) the chicken will actually cross the road.



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, November 4, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Monthly: Rental Home E-Harmony: What Tenant Is Perfect For Your Rental?




Dating web sites, like E-Harmony and Match.com, have grown in popularity and are apparently very effective; one in five people getting married met on-line, their advertising claims. That’s pretty good!




It can be even better for real estate. Many polls conclude that 90%+ of home searches begin on-line! Real estate web sites have the potential to be much better matchmakers!



But the real test of effectiveness is how many leases are consummated (for lack of a better word) from this on-line home matchmaking. And whether the landlords and tenants are happy with the union after move-in. Much like the 4 out of 5 people who don’t get married from the dating sites, sometimes it doesn’t work out between the landlords and tenants. Why not?



Maybe this matchmaking could be much more effective if there was a lot more honesty going on from both sides of the deal?



For example, on-line ads for homes tend to look like this regardless of what the home actually looks like:



Immaculate & cozy, this 3 BR / 2 BA stunner can make even the most choosy renter’s heart melt. Beautiful home with too many upgrades to count. Voted safest and best run neighborhood in Elmwood for 2 of the last 3 years (as reported by the Elmwood HOA Newsletter)! Priced attractively at $1,200/month and is sure to go fast!



And if the renter had an ad? It would read something like this:



Ideal tenants seek quiet abode for a loving family. Our 8 dogs are trained in Vienna (on Vienna Drive in Lincroft, NJ, it turns out…) and have never soiled a single fiber of carpet. Our rent is always paid on time and the only time the police come to our home is when we make them hot chocolate after they are done caroling in our neighborhood. We love our landlords and they love us!



But what is the truth? No tenants or landlords are filling out a 300-question survey where algorithms are going to match the tenant and house together. Each of them is going to claim that what they offer is top of the line, no matter what the real truth is. The problem for the landlord is that the tenant can see the home and make a determination if the rental ad is true, while the landlord must run an application and make a partially subjective decision on information gathered during the application process.



So how can landlords get the type of tenant they want? It really goes beyond the rental application. Much like dating is about being the mate that you want to attract, rental homes are the same way. What???



Generally-speaking, it’s a simple truth and goes like this:



If the rental house is priced economically (compared to similar homes on the market) and immaculate, the chances rise exponentially that tenant it attracts will be economical (buys things valued properly) and value cleanliness.



On the other hand, if the house is overpriced and dirty, the tenant it attracts will more likely spend recklessly (re: which may lead them into situations where they struggle to pay rent) and not care about the cleanliness of the home.



So, in practical terms, should the spots in the carpet be cleaned out prior to going to market? Yes, if the landlord wants a tenant who rents the home to care about spots on the carpet. What about cleaning the appliances? Only if the landlord cares about attracting tenants who care about clean appliances. Should the highest rent possible be asked for? Only if the landlord wants a tenant who doesn’t conduct research on their biggest expenditures which may signal their overall financial shakiness.



Much like humans, homes attract suitable mates. Good-looking people marry other good-looking people. Clean people rent clean houses. Financially responsible people don’t lock into overpriced rental homes.



What type of renter will your rental home naturally attract? Or more importantly, turn off?



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Saturday, October 1, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Monthly: Should I Even Bother to Try to Sell My House in this Market?



This is a question that I was posed on a call last week. For property managers, this is a no-brainer, right? It’s like any buying question to a salesperson in any industry:




Question from prospective client:

Do I need a haircut?



Barber:

Absolutely.



Question from prospective client:

Do I need insurance coverage for (fill in the blank)?



Answer from insurance agent:

Absolutely. If your family’s (fill in the blank) is important, it would potentially be devastating to live without it.



Question from potential client:

Can my house sell in this market? It didn’t with the past 2 real estate agents I used.



Answer from real estate agent (straight faced without blinking):

Absolutely! My team has a 10-point marketing plan that can sell any house in any market*!

* With a nominal 50% price reduction



So back to the original question:

Should someone even bother to try to sell their house in this market?



My answer:

It depends.



Depends on what?



You should try to sell your home if you:



1. Are living in the house and don’t have to move

2. Have a clean tenant who is amenable to showings

3. Have a unique house (be honest!) that is desirable in any market

4. Are able to afford to price the house competitively (aka on the low end)

5. Are willing to gamble and eat the rent every month and wait for a buyer who might or might not come



My answer to not bother putting the house on the market for sale is under the following conditions:



1. There are several foreclosures and short sales active in your home’s subdivision

2. You can’t afford to or don’t want to drastically discount your home price

3. The home is vacant and #3, #4, and/or #5 above don’t apply to you

4. Neighbors’ homes that are priced around the level you want to sell yours for are sitting



The simple truth is that the buy & sell real estate market is continuing on a sharp downtrend with no end in sight, while the rental market is on a sharp uptrend. Everyone still needs a place to live, but the banks are not willing to lend to less than perfect borrowers. This leads to a surplus of rental and rent-to-own tenants, and a dearth of buyers. So the question is if it is better to go fishing at the small pond stocked with thousands of fish or the big pond with 25?



Whether it still makes sense to list your home for sale really depends on your answers to the questions above. Truthfully, for most people, the best financial option is to stay put in their home. But going straight to the rental or rent-to-sell market is best for people who are:



1. In a time crunch

2. Need to move

3. Can’t or don’t want to afford 2 mortgage payments



Often, it just doesn’t make sense to put the home on the market for sale. It’s an exercise in futility and costs a good deal of money. It’s like asking out the head cheerleader to the prom when you know you are going to wind up going with Suzy next door anyway. You might as well cut to the chase and save yourself the time, expense, and effort.



That being said, one size never fits all. Determine what criteria above fit your situation and act accordingly!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)


Friday, September 9, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Monthly: Multiple Rental Offer Situations: Is Engagement The Same As Marriage?



So you’re walking down the street the day after successfully proposing marriage to your girlfriend, who now (you’ve been told) is to be referred as your “fiancée”. You’re happy and are convinced she was meant to be “The One”. But, wait; is that the beautiful Sasha Blue across the street? The girl of your dreams who always had those model boyfriends that put you permanently into the “friend” category? Is she looking at you? I think she is!




As you get closer, Miss Blue excitedly runs up to you. “Max, is that you? I was hoping to run into you! I finally got rid of that no-good Antonio! Wow… Is this the first time we are both single at the same time? How exciting! I’d love to catch up!”



As your heart races, your memory of getting down on one knee the night before is fading fast. Is it too late to run a reverse and go after Miss Blue? Engagement isn’t legally binding, is it? It’s a very interesting conundrum!



That is the same question that faces property management companies when multiple tenants apply for the same property at different times. At what engagement point prior to move-in is a tenant “locked” in and the property manager must forsake all other suitors?



Let’s look at a potential scenario: Tenant A applies for a property and is approved. They have not put a deposit down on the property yet. Tenant B sees the property the next day and loves it. They are a stronger applicant and are willing to pay more money per month. However, when talking with Tenant B, Tenant A puts down the deposit. Company policy is that whoever puts down the deposit first with an approved application gets the house. So, is Tenant B out of luck?



In most scenarios, yes. But there is a caveat. The property manager works for the owner. It is their job to get the best applicant that fits the home owner’s (aka their client’s) goals. Should the overall mandate to pursue what’s best for the owner trump company policy?



The easy answer is “of course!” The practical answer is yes and no- the solid, business school “it depends” response. On one hand, I don’t think it is reasonable to take a deposit from an approved tenant, keep the house on the market at a higher rate, and then renege on the agreement if another tenant appears that is willing to pay more. That could leave an applicant who dealt with the property management in good faith potentially homeless and dealing with the hassle of changing addresses, utilities, moving vans, and losing their piece of mind. This generates hate mail (rightfully so).



But, on the other hand, at what point is it reasonable to accept competing offers?



I believe that up until the tenant is told definitively that the home is theirs is a reasonable time to protect the owner’s interests. That may mean that if multiple applications come in (and even after deposits are put down), there is still time to review the applicants and decide which one is best for the owner. If the applicants are similar, then the first one who applied and put down a deposit should be given first dibs.



However, what about if the following applicant situations present themselves?



1. An applicant with a 600 credit score with average landlord history is approved and puts down a deposit before a 700 credit score applicant with great landlord history

2. 2 applicants are equal but one is willing to pay a higher monthly rent

3. 2 applicants are equal but one is willing to pay the year of rent upfront

4. One applicant is willing to move-in 3 weeks prior to the other



In these situations (if prior to giving “official” notice that the house is locked in for a certain tenant), then it is really imperative to choose the tenant that offers the best deal for the owner.



However, once official notice is given, I don’t believe it is ethical to offer the home to anyone else, regardless of the deal offered. The only way to supersede this is if the one tenant “buys out” the other in a separate negotiation. Money can make things happen!



So, if you asked to marry your fiancée, told her she was definitely “The One”, and gave her a ring, Miss Blue should be off limits. It may not be legally binding, but it’s the right thing to do.



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, July 22, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: The “Additional Security Deposit” Letter Exchange




Dear Property Manager,


I am very interested in the rental house you have listed! I think it will be perfect for our family. However, when you asked me for an additional month of security deposit, it made me concerned. Money doesn’t grow on trees these days and I thought the rental ad said you only needed one month down. We also have to come up with the first month’s rent and pet fees, so you’re talking about a pretty big sum already. I’ll be honest, I just don’t have it.



I explained our situation to you. The economy had turned against us, but we’re past it! My wife is employed again and getting you the rent will be no problem. Haven’t you ever had anything happen to you before? Have a heart! We’d take great care of the home, but just need the security deposit reduced. My business is booming so things will be fine! Don’t worry! You’ll get your money!



So what do you say? Can you help me out?



Sincerely,

Mr. Tenant



P.S. My wife thought you looked exquisite in your emerald blazer! It’s a bold move to wear it in 97 degree heat, if you ask me, but it’s better to look good than feel good, right?



Mr. Tenant,

Thank your wife for the kind words about my blazer. Typically they run the air conditioning at 40 below (so I try to stay prepared), but it didn’t work well when we moved outside. Emerald has sort of grown on me as I’ve gotten older. I think it complements my eyes, but opinions sometimes vary. You know, you make a call on the outfit every morning and sometimes you hit it out of the park and sometimes you whiff. Truth be told, I’d settle for hitting singles in the clothing department!



As for the request for additional security deposit monies, I understand your concern. Let me explain our rationale.



I understand you hit a rough spot a year ago; that happens. It’s obviously not just you; we see applications like this everyday. We also rent to a lot of people who have hit rough spots before! It’s not a deal-killer.



But there are other mitigating factors. Let’s look at your credit application and income. Your scores are obviously not good, but I’m not overly worried about that. There looks to be some recent 30-day late payments on power bills and cable. Your current landlord said that you had a few late payments as well during their lease (at an amount less than you would be paying now). You gave us your business bank statements to show your income, but it’s not clear how much of that actually makes it to you. This information collectively gives me pause about your financial condition.



My job as a property manager is to mitigate risk for our client, the owner of the home you want to rent. I personally think you would be a great tenant; anyone who compliments my wardrobe is good in my book! But if something happened to you that turned into a decent size expense, I can’t say with much certainty (with the information we have) that your lease wouldn’t be at risk. If an extra thousand dollar deposit is a deal-killer from your end, what would happen if your car stopped running next week? You obviously would need to fix that first to get to work. The owner of the home would be left waiting for their payment. And we wouldn’t be doing our job well.



If you have something that addresses these concerns, please send this information over so we can consider it! We make money by filling properties, so we want to approve you! We just have to protect our clients first.



I hope this letter clears the air. Thank you for your interest in our home and I hope we can work together in the future.



Sincerely,

Your Property Manager



P.S. On your suggestion, I’m wearing a short-sleeved cotton blend shirt today, no jacket. It feels good- thanks for the suggestion!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Thursday, July 14, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: The Cheap Rental Home Game: A Saga of Ups & Downs- 10 Tips for Survival

Cheap rental homes remind me of buying electronics off the street.




Street Urchin: “$50 Bucks! Flat screen television for $50! Why are you even thinking about it? This is a great deal- CHEEP!!”



My mind (definitely thinking about it): “Hmmm… I need a flat screen, but this thing is either stolen or a piece of garbage. But, if it’s not (and his uncle really died and bequeathed it to him), this is a great deal!”



My mouth: “OK, I’ll give you forty-five for it.”



This is the type of deal I see people making to buy homes for as little as $10K. It’s really a gamble, but can be a lucrative one if it works out. I mean, the ups can be great!



For example, a $20K house’s payments come to approximately $130/month (believe it or not, there are no HOA fees to worry about!). The home can rent for $400. That’s a positive cash flow of $270/month, which is not bad! With a $100K credit line, this could equal 5 homes. I like the math, $270 multiplied by five homes equals $1,350/month. That’s a monthly return of 13.5%. Oh yeah! So the flat screen works and works well! I’ve got a great television and an even better story of my tough negotiating tactics to match.



But then, there are the down times. The house is cheap and old, and things start breaking down. The tenants (savvy to the system) call the city’s code enforcement department, who find a lot more stuff that’s not at code. The landlord is required to fix them (or face fines) which eats into the return. Several of the tenants think that requests for rent are merely suggestions; they promise payment, but it never comes (even after thousands of dollars in repairs are done). Evicting them is a double-whammy as no rent is coming in and the attorney fees are going out. The house becomes vacant and vandals begin to smash windows; neighborhood kids start using the home as a party pad. After filing ineffective police report after police report, it’s clear that the police don’t want to be in the neighborhood unless absolutely necessary. Then again, neither does the landlord.



So now “you get what you pay for” begins to ring true. The flat screen has stopped working and has somehow completely shot the electric system of my condo. A detective from the police department has left a business card on my door. Unfortunately, I threw away my old television set (“Good riddance, 20th Century!” I said…) and am now forced to read a lot more.



So how do people make money off of cheap homes? Well, the margin is there so some savvy investors have figured it out. A guy I used to work with told me his system:



1. Thoroughly inspect to see what’s broken and on the verge of wearing out. Include this in the upfront cost of the home.

2. Leave the home broken up until someone moves in. Then repair it.

3. Never have carpet in the house; always use vinyl or a hard surface that cleans off well for flooring.

4. Get tenant referrals from good existing tenants

5. Find out when pay day is and show up in person on that day. Accept cash and carry a gun.

6. Find a handyman who lives in the community to take care of the needed maintenance/repairs.

7. Understand that evictions and losses are part of the game sometimes. There will rarely be months where something doesn’t happen. It’s not upsetting, it’s business.

8. The homes will probably never go up significantly in value and will be difficult to impossible to sell on the market. This is purely a cash flow play.

9. Buy these homes in bulk and spread the gains and losses across many homes.

10. Make enough cash flow to hire someone else to do the dangerous duties (aka visiting the properties).



Cheap homes are meant for the savvy investor with a system, not the guy looking for a deal on an inexpensive set on the street. A steel stomach doesn’t hurt either!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, July 8, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Is “Final Tenant Approval” Desirable For Landlords?

As I was thinking about this question the other day, I had a flashback to my high school history class. The first thing I learned from this trip down memory lane was that it is indeed possible to daydream about hours of daydreaming.




The second thing I learned was the strange applicability of our class’s discussion on democracy in regards to approving prospective tenant applications. The question was whether a true democracy (everyone makes the decisions) or a representative democracy (“experts” were voted in to make the decisions) was better.



The effectiveness of a true democracy was illustrated by a story that Aristotle told. It goes something like this:



You’re on a big cruise ship with 100 other passengers. Everything is going fine until it is clear a major storm is on the horizon. The ship is about to navigate a tight channel where it could easily be dashed upon the rocks if steered incorrectly. Any wrong move would spell imminent disaster for all the passengers. What to do?



A true democracy would offer a vote to everyone on the ship to determine which way to steer the rudder (“Raise your hand if you think we should steer right. Okay, after the final count of hands, the ‘Lefts’ have it.”). Aristotle said he’d prefer to rely on the captain and his crew to make that decision. This discourse lead to our founding fathers (many years later) settling on a representative democracy as America’s form of government; a true democracy sounds better, but wouldn’t work as well in practice. The captain, due to his experience and expertise, would know best.



Tenant selection is one of the most important duties a property manager performs for landlords. Tenants make or break (unfortunately, literally sometimes) a rental property. They will pay and treat the property well, or they won’t. Knowing who they are as people and their background greatly mitigates this risk. This is why the front end tenant screening by a property manager is so vital. And experience in tenant selection counts!



Some landlords want to be hands-on in this process. I don’t have an issue to this prior to going to market. But if the hands-on treatment is expected to go on for the duration of the tenant selection process, there is little need for a property manager. I would recommend posting a few rental ads and going the “do-it-yourself” route. This works for some people. It also (potentially) saves money, but greatly increases the risk.



It reminds me of my favorite all-time television show, 24. Kiefer Sutherland (Jack) would only try to bandage people with life-threatening injuries in the field if it was an absolute emergency. Most of the time he would just send them to CTU’s medical clinic for treatment. And, at no point did he ask Chloe (from CTU’s IT staff) to give him pointers on bandaging the wound. He trusted the professionals.



And so should landlords. “Final tenant approval” can be used as a cop-out by property managers. If things go south with a tenant, “final tenant approval” makes it very easy for the property manager to say, “Well, you gave final approval for the tenant we placed, so what happened isn’t really my fault.” I even sometimes see property management companies advertise this “feature”, making it appear to be desirable! All I can say is that if my sister died on the operating table and the doctor came to me and said, “You know, I asked you for “final removal approval” on which part of her organ to cut out… you said ‘OK’…” I would be incredulous! I mean, what do I know about medical procedures? Why would he ask me what to do? I’m paying for his expertise!



True democracy may sound good, but a representative democracy works much better in practice. Let the “final tenant approval” come from the expert you hired!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Wednesday, June 29, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Too Many Repair Requests? 5 Methods To Stop The (Cash Flow) Bloodshed


As a property management company, we work to maximize the cash flow of our clients. Period. We don’t have a problem admitting that.




Sometimes things break in rental homes and that decreases the cash flow our clients receive. They don’t like it, and we don’t either. However, it is part of the game (pardon my street talk), so it is a necessary expense. Sometimes.



Normally if a repair policy is explained to tenants properly at the lease signing, there aren’t any problems. The landlord is responsible for operational issues; that is, if there isn’t any evidence of negligence by the tenant (if there is, the “Sorry if you smashed your toilet because your girlfriend dumped you for being volatile, but the bill goes to you…” message is sent). Then the easy stuff (changing light bulbs, air filters, etc.) is taken care of by the tenant. It’s simple stuff and everyone gets along grandly.



If the home is on the newer side and maintained, there just aren’t that many maintenance calls. Most people want their homes to operate properly (“hey, it’s nice to have the dryer dry clothes in less than 3 hours, so maybe I’ll clean the lint filter occasionally”), so they do the small things to keep it that way.



However, there are some tenants that seem to discover an awful lot of problems that they want the owner to fix. And when they are compared to other tenants, their identity becomes painfully obvious. The calls and the e-mails of their problems continue month-after-month. It gets to the point that everyone involved with managing the property has the tenant’s contact information memorized (“Oh, 704-xxx-xxxx? Mrs. X must be calling from work today.”) Sometimes, the repair requests are a string of bad luck and legitimate; often the tenant is trying to take advantage of the landlord’s altruism and is under the impression they don’t have to lift a finger because someone else will take care of them.



Repairs really hurt cash flow. But if the repairs aren’t done, unhappy tenants also hurt cash flow by trying to use their seemingly one point of leverage (holding back rent) to get what they want done. So what to do?



Before getting to some techniques to ward off unwarranted repair requests, I want to first iterate that almost all tenants (that I’ve worked with, at least) are reasonable with their repair requests. Most have busy lives and can’t be bothered will illegitimate claims. It’s not a huge problem on a whole. I find that doing the repairs that are requested builds trust and keeps everything running smoothly. So requested repairs should usually be done.



For the tenants that abuse the repair system, here are the top techniques to stop the illegitimate request flow:



1. Recalibrate expectations on repairs: Before the next repair is done, a meeting should be set with all principals on the lease. The purpose of the meeting (or call) is to reexamine the lease and go over exactly what is covered by the landlord and what is not. Also, it is probably time to schedule a walk-through of the house to make sure the maintenance agreement is being followed.

2. Alert the repair vendors that fraud is suspected: Vendors who visit the home should be put on alert. They can provide information about what claims are legitimate. If a claim is due to non-compliance with the maintenance agreement or rough play, the tenant needs to be billed for the issue, not the landlord!

3. Push back: If it was your house, what would you be calling a repairman fix, and what would you be doing yourself? That question is a good start to figuring out what repairs may be unnecessary for the landlord to cover.

4. Keep at code: The landlord is responsible, by law, to keep the rental home at building code. Nothing more. What is being requested beyond that?

5. Relocation: Maybe it’s worth asking the tenants if they would be more comfortable in someone else’s home?



Though this issue isn’t overly common, it can be uncommonly expensive and will continually siphon cash flow. If you find yourself signing over the monthly rent to the handyman month-after-month, it may be time to try something new!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, June 24, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: “Free” Repair Quotes on Rental Homes Can Cost You Money




Everyone wants to save money! But to what lengths (and for what) does it make sense to find “deals”? It really depends on the urgency level of the need. Here are three scenarios of high, middle, and no urgency:




High urgency (nurse): “Your daughter needs the heart transplant now! Do we have your consent? …I don’t know how much it costs, sir… it will be itemized on your bill later, I suppose… No, there is no AAA discount on this procedure… I’ve never seen a coupon like that- it looks like you typed up ‘50% OFF’ and then wrote 'Group-On' on top of it… No, I suppose we don’t want to lose your business to a competitor… We’re losing her!! Yes, we do validate parking.”



Middle urgency (property manager): “The house needs one bedroom painted, the carpets cleaned, and the outside power washed before we can put it on the market… You said you want 3 quotes per repair?”



No urgency (sales clerk at Best Buy): “The new iphone detachable screen is really cool! You’re a loser if you don’t get one! We only have 10 million of these left, but when they’re gone, we’ll call our factory in China to make more… $199 for a screen to put on top of your screen (that already works) is a bargain. This is as cheap as it gets (until next week when ‘Detachable Screen Mini’ comes out). There is no discount; it’s under $200 bucks already, man! Go to another store then! …Fine, don’t call me crying when you are shunned socially and professionally for your weak iphone accessorizing…”



So the point of these scenarios is to illustrate that “high urgency” scenarios need to be acted on immediately, with no time to haggle. And “no urgency” scenarios allow time to shop vendors for price; time is on your side (yes, it is)!



But what about “middle urgency” scenarios? We run into these sometimes when tenants move out and the rental home needs to go back on the market. Houses need to be repaired, and some landlords want to quote out every repair multiple times to get the lowest price. This sounds reasonable, even prudent. The repairs do need to be made in a reasonable time, but not tomorrow or next week. Time is on their side (yes, it is?) to get repair quotes. Right?



Well, it’s a “middle urgency” scenario (not a “no urgency” scenario) because there are other factors in play. Every investment home has some combination of costs that accrue every day it’s vacant: mortgage payments, HOA fees, lawn care, utilities, property taxes, etc. For easy math, let’s say these come to $900/month. $900 split into a 30-day month is $30/day. This is a very real cost; the meter is running daily.



For this example, let’s say the initial repair quote comes in at $500. After getting 3 quotes per repair item, the repair quote is whittled down to $400. Congratulations- that’s a 20% savings of $100!



But, wait, is it really? Getting those additional quotes took 10 days. 10 days of vacancy multiplied by 30 days equals $300. So, to save $100, it cost $300. The net loss is $200, plus all the time and headaches it took to coordinate vendors and sort through repair quotes.



Unfortunately, this is not the totality of the loss sometimes. Empty homes are risky! Talk to any police officer and ask them whether they have any problems with vacant rental homes being broken into in this economy. If this happens, stolen appliances and break-in damages escalate the costs upward substantially. Remember: the longer the home is vacant, the higher the risk.



“Free” repair quotes can cost a lot! Don’t over-quote yourself into a financial loss!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Thursday, June 16, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Recruiting Great Tenants- Your Team Is Only As Good As Your Players




It’s been said the most important part of major college coaching is recruiting. A team’s ultimate potential can be limited to their talent level. Sure, good coaching can make good players better, but great players are the reason teams win championships and are consistently good.




I started thinking about this the other day when a friend of mine called. He told me that a friend of his bought a property management company in Charlotte and it is proving to be a nightmare. The company he bought has sloppy books, awful employees, and a large cache of substandard properties that are in disrepair. But most importantly, they have a lot of tenants that have not been paying rent and have stayed in the houses rent-free for months. His friend is watching his investment go up in flames as he tries to salvage what’s left.



This made me think. What would be the characteristic that would be most important to measure the strength of a property management company? Is it good employees, growing cash flow, long-term contracts in place, sound business procedures, or something else? They are all obviously very important. But what’s the ultimate key to success?



As I thought more about it, my head began to hurt and my mind drifted to sports:



Why did Coach Nick Nolte agree to buy Ricky a new truck in the movie, Blue Chips? Why are there so many recruiting scandals in college athletics? Why do I read about “tampering” charges in the professional leagues when teams illegally contact players when they are not allowed? Why are college coaches only allowed to send potential recruits a limited number of text messages and are restricted on how often they can call them? Why do coaches work harder in the offseason traveling to visit recruits than they do during the season? Why do the Charlotte Bobcats think they can rebuild the team with late round draft picks?



Then the answer occurred to me. The players are the most important thing. They directly dictate the success of a coach. If a team has great players, they will be a good team (no matter the coaching quality). That is why recruiting is so important and organizations are willing to push the envelope on wooing potential stars.



As a rule, every top-tier athletic team puts a premium on signing great players. And this is the same mentality that top-tier landlords and property managers, like you, must have to build a strong property management company and investment portfolio. It’s about getting great tenants for your properties. They will directly dictate your success.



When a great tenant applies for a property, it is imperative to let them know that you want them. You need them. You will treat them like gold if they would just sign with you (on the lease). Text and call them every hour (there are no contact restrictions in business, only the weirdness factor of over-communication). Add incentives. Buy them the pony they always wanted, as long as it is munching the grass in your rental home’s yard! Let them know your love will never end if they can out down a deposit today.



Great tenants provide so many great benefits! They pay on-time and in full providing consistent cash flow. They take care of the properties so they don’t fall into neglect. They let you know if your employees are lacking or slacking. They even take care of minor repairs on their own!



Your team, investment, and/or company is only as strong as the players it has signed. Maniacally pursue the best, get them under contract, and rest will take care of itself!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, June 10, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: With Obama & Landlords, You Can’t Legally Withhold Payment



Taxpayer: “This country is going down the drain quickly with no end in sight! Obama is proving himself to be a bum like the rest of them. “Change to believe in”? I’m laughing too hard to retort. You wanna know what? I’m not funding this incompetent government anymore and will not be a party to it. I’m not paying taxes until this country is fixed!”




Tenant: “This house is killing me! This week the faucet broke. A month before it was the air conditioner. It took 48 hours for the landlord to get the maintenance guy to fix it in 98 degree heat! 98 degrees my family put up with! My sweet daughter, Abby, must have gone through at least 20 popsicles. “Daddy, why is it so hot?” she quietly bleated as she read “Seventeen” Magazine with a cold washcloth lain across her forehead (with the few remaining ice cubes that our (too small) freezer could muster). The landlord should be paying us to live in this house! I’m certainly not paying him this month! Next month’s payment is “under review” too; we’ll see how the faucet repair goes.”



Obama and (diplomatic and highly educated) landlords: “I feel your pain! Once, my radiator broke in my dorm room at Harvard and it just wasn’t fair that it took over 72 hours to repair! The economy is weak and jobs are scarce. Injustices like this need to be made right! But… like with all things that are dearest to us, these things sometimes take time. In the meantime, if you don’t pay me, your house will be taken away.”



The point of these fictitious quotes is that tenants and American citizens do not have to like what is going on with their house or country, respectively. But they still have to pay.



There seems to be a common misconception that home repairs and rental payments are linked. Legally, they are not. If the house is falling apart, the lease still stands. If the country is (hypothetically) suffering high unemployment and being financially run into bankruptcy, citizens still have to pay their taxes. It’s the law.



However, this is not an open invitation for landlords to not complete necessary repairs in a timely fashion. Slow and incomplete repair work makes tenants very unhappy; keeping tenants as happy as possible is paramount to having them stick around! Plus, there are other painful avenues unhappy tenants can take to legally have a home that is functioning to building code. It just can’t happen through rent abatement.



But I’ve seen this played out. Tenants go to court thinking that repairs not being done to their satisfaction will get them a free pass from eviction from a judge. This is just not the case. They find out quickly that their repair issues (even if extremely legitimate) are a moot point in an eviction hearing; these arguments are not heard because it’s not the place for them to be arbitrated. In an eviction hearing, it comes down to one question, “Do you have payment or proof of payment?” If the answer is “yes”, the tenant wins. If the answer is “no, but”, they don’t.



Rental payments and repair work are two separate issues. Tenants are obligated to pay by contract. That’s it.



You don’t have to like Obama, but you don’t want to try not paying him!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, June 3, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: How To Handle Evictions And The Reasons To Avoid Them




Handyman: I was over working on your property and your tenant seemed to be really happy.




Owner: You would be too if you were living rent-free.



When tenants don’t pay, it is not good for anyone. Inevitably, things get put in motion. The owner gets upset and wants to know why they haven’t gotten their money. The property manager is spurred to issue threats to lower the hammer on non-payers. The tenants typically try to go “dark” (incommunicado), as Jack Bauer (and those in the spy game) would say.



I think of the Tupac song that I was mistakenly listening to a few years back. It talked about the deep pride he felt about having the ability to pay the rent. I believe that people do want to pay, but they can’t give what they don’t have. Life happens and things cost money. If the rent is not getting paid, it is never the only expense that is being neglected.



Unfortunately, there really isn’t much to do as a landlord but file for eviction if the rent money doesn’t come in. However, due to the costs, stress, and actual time, it is something o be avoided if at all possible! There are two common avoidance techniques that have minimal success:



1. Payment plans to catch up on rent: I’ve been burned on these! If the tenant is on a fixed income and is living paycheck-to-paycheck, there is really no way for them to get out of the hole. The plans seldom work. I really have to have history with the tenant and think highly of their character to entertain these.

2. Negotiated exits: this allows the tenant to leave without an eviction and saves the owner money for the court stuff. The only problem with this is, “How does the tenant have money to pay another landlord when he’s not paying you?”



So, how does one file for eviction as a private landlord? Well, in NC, this is how a normal eviction goes:



1. Make sure the tenant always receives a rental statement with what’s owed on the first of the month (this is your “demand for rent” letter). We e-mail them.

2. The first day evictions can be filed is the 11th of the month. You’ll need to go down to the courthouse with a copy of the lease, a few stamped envelopes, and cash. Ask someone where evictions are filed, go there, wait in line, fill out the paperwork and envelopes, and give these items to the clerk.

3. Once you receive the nod from the clerk, exit stage right (or left); just get out of there. Hanging out at the courthouse isn’t that fun. Or cool (unless you’re a high-priced lawyer working for Lockhart-Gardner).

4. Wait for the eviction court date to arrive in the mail in one of the envelopes you provided. The show up to court on that day 20 minutes early to fill out the paperwork that you’ll need for the trial. Do what the judge says. You should “win”.



You are now thinking, “Yeah! It’s over! I won! I knew I should have forgone mortuary school (stupid “Six Feet Under”!) and been a lawyer instead!” Uh, no. Not quite. The next steps which cost more money and take a month to complete are as follows:



1. Wait 10 days to file a “Writ of Possession”. This can be accomplished at the same desk at the courthouse. Please bring a new stash of stamped envelopes, cash, and the eviction notice you received in the mail from the court. You’ll repeat basically the same process for the eviction in step #2 with the new “Writ of Possession” paperwork.

2. Get out of there. Don’t mingle. Your head needs to be down and a beeline made for your escape vehicle. Pretend to be talking on your cell phone while speed walking. Wipe profusive sweat off of your brow. Wear a hood to cover your head, if weather appropriate.

3. Wait for the sheriff to call you to let you know when they will be at the house to change the locks. This takes a week or two. After they call, you’ll need to call a locksmith and schedule them to meet you at the house when you meet the sheriff.

4. Show up and be really uncomfortable. Watch the sheriff remove tenants from the home and the locksmith change the locks. Give the locksmith cash after he hands you the new keys.

5. The tenant now has 10 days to remove their things. They will call you to schedule a time for you to let them in the house. If their things are not removed within 10 days, you are required to store anything of value at your expense if they want it later (because you’re so nice (!) and it’s the law).

6. Begin the process of fixing up the house to get it in market shape.



I hope this is enough evidence showing that evictions are not desirable! To avoid these costly evictions, utilize thorough tenant screening procedures upfront!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Talking To Your Tenant Will Cost You Money


“Talk is Cheap.” (Keith Richards)




“Talk can be expensive!” (Property Manager)



There are “hands-off” owner clients. And then there are the “hands-on” varieties.



The “hands off” clients just want to know the rent money is in their account on the day they expect. If there are repairs that are going to cost them money, they want to know that too. They just want the bare bone facts with no fluff. That’s fine.



Then there are the “hands-on” owners. They want to be continually updated if there is any news at all about their properties. “What repairs are needed now?” “Is the tenant caring for the lawn?” That’s fine. “How did Felicia do on her math test last Friday?”



What??? Who’s Felicia?



As I pull the property folder and scan through the lease, “Felicia” is listed as an 8-year old occupant. Unfortunately, no math test scores were listed. Darn!



As a property manager, we work for the owners. However, we want to have good relationships with our tenants as well. When executed properly, we serve as a cordial buffer between them. That is a valuable service!



However, we can’t get too friendly with tenants, as much as we’d like to with many of them. We don’t work for them. If we get involved talking about their families and what’s going on with Felicia, we can’t do our jobs effectively. For example, what happens when they don’t pay rent and we need to evict them? The relationship gets really personal; personal to the effect of your “friend” calling you screaming that you’re heartless, they can’t understand why you would evict them when you know she lost her job, and how we felt about Felicia being homeless? Yeah, that’s not a good conversation.



Any decent property manager (with any length of experience) quickly learns to keep a professional distance so this type of scenario doesn’t happen. Dealing with these types of situations where bad things happen in our residents’ lives is part of the job (not a good part!). But we know how to deal with them.



This is where the “hands-on” owner sometimes gets in trouble. They decide to contact the tenant in their home and forge a bond. Instead of relying on the property manager for home updates, they go straight to the source. And this is where talk leaves the “free zone” and becomes expensive. Here are a few examples:



1. The owner calls the tenant regularly and asks how things are going. The tenant brings up any minor issue with the home. The owner feels compelled to ask us to send a repairman there.

2. The property manager asks for a rental price increase. The tenant calls the owner directly and makes their case on why they can’t afford it. The rent stays the same.

3. The tenant is late paying rent and the eviction is scheduled to begin. The tenant calls the owner and swears to pay soon. The owner asks us to call of the eviction. This usually doesn’t work out and the owner loses more money.



My favorite all-time story on this topic is the owner who called us about rescinding a rental increase planned for his tenant. When we asked why he didn’t want the extra money, he said:



“It’s not worth it to me to hear him griping night-after-night about it. To even it up, he’d just make me pick up more rounds at the bar anyway.”



When owners talk to tenants, it takes their relationship from a business to a personal one. And it’s tough for most to say “no” to a friend, even when it means taking a financial loss.



So save some money and resist the urge to talk to your tenant. Rest assured, Felicia’s very capable math teacher is doing her job!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, May 20, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: When Tenants Want Out, Let Them Go: 3 Tips to Negotiating Early Lease Terminations


“Let my people go.” (Moses to Pharaoh)




Happiness. Everybody wants it. That goes for tenants, property managers, puppies, you name it. To accomplish it, sometimes a change of scenery is necessary. I mean, you want to go where everybody knows your name. And they’re always glad you came. Right?



Occasionally, we have tenants who are not happy with their home. They want to break their lease and move out immediately! Things are not fixed up the way they want, the neighbors are unpleasant, and work is too far away. Utility bills are too high, the building complex is too noisy, and their “party friends” found out where they were living.



Some tenants want to take this frustration out on their property managers (I’ll pause briefly for your feelings of sympathy/empathy). Unhappiness can be like gangrene, infecting everyone in its path. It’s not desirable, or necessary! I just want to write them a letter:



Dear Beloved Tenant,


Why so glum, friend? It seems like we’ve had a tough time connecting recently. All relationships have rough patches. We can get through this!






I’m sorry you are unhappy with the house. This happens! It’s tough to know exactly what is best when looking at a house for only a short time. I mean, over 50% of couples who are around each other everyday for years wind up unhappy and divorcing (remember the story you told me about that with your Aunt Cathy and the one-armed sailor?); sometimes our judgment when making long-term commitments isn’t what it should be! But take heart! I understand. We can talk through this!






I know threatening to not pay rent may seem like a good idea now, but it’s not a path that is good for anyone. If you really want to leave, we can work something out. Life is too short and you seemed like such a happy person when we first met (with your rhinestone-collared Shitzu in tow)! Oh, how we laughed as she frolicked! Let’s get you back to that place!






Sincerely,


Your PM






P.S. We need to hug soon. Please pet Mitsy for me.



Keeping unhappy tenants locked into their leases isn’t a “best practice”. It can actually be counterproductive and less profitable than letting them go!



It’s all about how the negotiation is handled. First, let’s establish the needs and concerns of each party:

1. The tenants want to move out. They’re concerned about facing legal and credit score consequences for breaking their lease.

2. The owner wants someone sending them money every month to pay for their home investment. They are concerned about vacancy, costs to get their property into market condition, and marketing costs for a new tenant.



So where is the win-win? Here are three tips in getting there:

1. The rental home goes on the market immediately. The tenant agrees to keep the home in immaculate showing shape and be extremely accommodating for prospective renters wanting to view it.

2. The tenant gives a 30-day notice to vacate and pays a 2-month lease termination fee. If the house is filled prior to 60 days, this falls to a 1-month lease termination fee that will be refunded to the tenant (incentives are important!).

3. The tenant is required to leave the home in move-in condition (including steam cleaning the carpets and a thorough cleaning). The security deposit is insurance of this. (Note: make sure this side agreement for early termination is in writing)



The owner should be kept whole financially with a new paying renter, and the tenant gets their freedom in 30 days with no consequences. A win-win situation is achieved.



Then we can all go back to being happy again. Cheers!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, May 13, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Rent-To-Own: Why Locking into a Home Price Today is a Brilliant Bet



“You want me to lock into a price today on a house that could be worth $30K less in two years? You’re crazy!” (Potential rent-to-own tenant)




Human nature is a funny thing. There is a herd mentality that seems to be so tough to break. If everyone is buying, then it is the time to buy. When everyone is selling, it is time to sell. When everyone is doing nothing, it is time to do nothing. And so on.



The shrewdest, and consequently, richest investors do the opposite. Examples:



1. “I buy straw hats in the winter.” (John Paul Getty)

2. “The time to buy is when there is blood in the streets.” (Wall Street Mantra)



So, basically, the idea is to buy low (and when no one else is) and sell high. That makes sense to me. Let’s see how this translates into rent-to-own deals being formulated today.



Rent-to-own home transactions (aka lease options) have become in vogue in the past year or two since the banks stopped lending to a large part of the public. Lease options allow tenants to lease the property, while buying an “option” (aka the contractual right) to purchase the property at a locked-in price sometime in the future (typically anywhere from 1-3 years). So, in short, the rent-to-own tenants rent and can buy the property at a pre-negotiated price anytime during their lease period. It’s pretty simple.



The purchase of the option (cost: typically 1-5% of the home’s purchase price) is a sticking point for some tenants now; I would argue that it is the best, and most vital, part of the deal for people who want to be homeowners, especially now. Why? For a few thousand dollars, the tenant gets:



1. Peace of mind: the owner cannot sell the property out from under them, nor jack up the purchase price at the last minute

2. Financial flexibility: the option can be exercised (aka the tenant purchases the home), or not. So the house can be test-driven for a few years and the tenant can choose to buy it if they like the price of the home; if not, they can keep renting or move-out. Let’s take a quick poll: how many people who bought homes in the past 5 years wish that they bought an option (with the ability to walk away hassle-free from the house) instead of actually purchasing? Let’s see… a few thousand dollars to buy an option or the home value dropping tens of thousands of dollars minimum with no escape clause. Your call.

3. Home flexibility: the tenant can make upgrades, paint rooms, and basically make the home their own. They don’t have to ever move out, if they choose.

4. A brilliant bet on the housing market



What? What’s with point #4? Lease options equal a tenant bet? No, not just a bet, but a great bet. A brilliant bet.



The housing market is in flux. There has been a prolonged historical drop in home prices that is trending even lower. People are scared. The crowd is not buying homes. There is blood in the streets. Wait- could this be the time the great investors would be telling you to buy?



Of course. The housing market is really low. Through a lease option, rent-to-own tenants could buy an option to lock into a depressed home price today that would be exercisable for the next several years. And the option would cost only a few thousand dollars, and has a huge upside for profit when the housing market recovers.



Break away from the crowd! Use lease options for brilliant financial returns!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, May 6, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Rental Home Walk-Throughs: 4 Ways to Protect Yourself



“You know you have a good compromise when both sides are slightly unhappy.” (Many Authors Credited)




As a Charlotte property manager, my least favorite part of the job are the end-of-lease walk-throughs; that is, when the tenant moves out, and we visit the property to check out its condition. If there are damages, we need to decide whether they are “normal wear and tear” (no charge to the tenant) or damages that need to be repaired from the tenant funds. It’s very subjective.



There are three scenarios when it comes to these property manager walk-throughs. The house is left in:



1. Great condition: The tenant gets their security deposit back and the owner doesn’t have to pay much to get the home in market shape. Everyone is happy.

2. Mediocre Condition: Some of the damage is normal wear and tear, and some of it was caused by too much rough play by the tenant. This is where the greatest conflicts occur between owner and tenant.

3. Poor Condition: The security deposit is basically conceded by the tenant. They know they don’t deserve anything back and hope that there is no future contact concerning the property. The owner is able to use the security deposit to mitigate repair costs.



I’m going to focus on the most challenging situation, the home left in “mediocre condition”. This can elicit two different responses from the same walk-through report:



Owner: “You’re killing me! That tenant treated my home like a kid’s tree house and they are only being charged $500 for damages? Add a zero please! They should be put in jail! Did they ever think to cover the food in microwave so it didn’t erupt all inside of it? Did they decide to save money on towels and wipe their hands on the walls? The carpet was new when they moved in! You’re being easy on them! You represent me, remember? Why do you like them so much?”



Tenant: “You’re killing me! I treated that home like my own! I cleaned it daily. We took our shoes off when we were inside (which we shouldn’t have even bothered with, being that the carpet was shoddy-looking when we moved in- I told you this!! Remember??) There might have been a couple things wrong, but I could have fixed them for like $50! $500? Are you crazy?? I thought you liked me! This is highway robbery! You’ll be hearing from my attorney!”



Property managers are really trying to do the right thing, but are stuck in the middle of competing interests. It’s sort of like being friends with both the wife and the husband when they are in the midst of a divorce. You want to be friends with both (like usual), without either of them feeling slighted. Practically-speaking, that can be tough to do!



To make this experience as clean and easy as possible, I’d offer the following four suggestions to landlords:

1. Trust your instincts- there is no “right” answer and it is usually impossible to make both parties entirely happy

2. Be specific on damages and document repair costs

3. Have a consistent methodology on how costs are assessed

4. Take pictures or use video during the walk-through so tenants can see the damages they are being charged for



Though rental home walk-throughs can’t always be pain-free, there are ways to limit potential fall-out from this necessary part of the property management business.



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, April 29, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: When Should Rental Rates be Negotiated?


As a Charlotte-area property manager, we get contacted (usually via e-mail) by prospective tenants asking us if the owner is willing to accept less than the listed rental rate. This question gets asked before the tenant even looks at the rental home.




I guess with the “new normal”, Group-On world we are living in, some might assume that consumers are not willing to look at something that isn’t drastically reduced; I don’t necessarily agree with this. But it does bring up the question: How does a property manager answer such a query on an immediate price reduction? There are obviously two ways to do this.



Question from Prospective Tenant: Will you lower the price even though I haven’t even seen the home and have done nothing besides click the rental ad to e-mail you?



Answer from Property Manager: Yes! How much would you prefer to pay? The list price is merely a starting point for negotiations, my astute friend! Property management’s new business model is akin to the “suggested donation” for entrance into a benefit concert. By the way, all the new chairs in our office are of the “EZ-Fold” style; we sit on them while eating our Burger King “Have It Your Way” Whopper, Jrs.



OR



Answer from Property Manager: No! The listing price is the listing price! I’m offended by your audaciousness, you crooked wretch! In a battle of wills, we will win. Think about it: our downside is that the rental home is on the market for a few more days; your downside is homelessness. The rent has now doubled for you! Scram!



Neither of these is a winning response (caution: do not use these responses at home or the office), but they do cover each end of the spectrum of responses to this “negotiation.” The best answer is somewhere in the middle of this spectrum. But where?



First of all, let’s clarify what a “negotiation” is. A true negotiation is where both sides give something of value and, in turn, receive something in return. In this example, the property manager is giving a discount in rent (real dollars), and the tenant has not even committed to visiting the property (let alone filling out an application and putting down a deposit)!



This example is not a negotiation; it is an example of a fishing expedition. Or a game show called, “How Desperate is the Owner to Rent Out their Property?” So giving away rent money for nothing is an obvious no-go. The best answer to an immediate query about reducing the rent would be something along the lines of, “I’m not sure how the owners would feel about that. If you visit the property and are interested, it is certainly something I could ask them.”



Okay, this does risk alienating some people. However, if the rental price is close to market value, then other renters will materialize. However, if the house has been on the market for a while, this may be a game you want to play. Proceed cautiously so you don’t wind up throwing free lawn care and daily Bojangles biscuits in as well to close the deal.



What about if the tenants do look at the property, are interested, and then try to negotiate the rental price? If the owner is willing to reduce the rent, I think an argument could be made to do this; however, this would be only if the tenants are strong candidates (great credit scores, landlord history, and income). Tenants who pay on time, keep the property in good shape, and do not create problems for others (neighbors, police, and property managers…) are worth their weight in gold. If they do not fit this bill, I would decline any reduction in rent.



Rental rate negotiation may be subjective, but common negotiation rules still apply. Make sure you get when you give! No “quid” without “quo”!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Property Management Owner’s Dilemma: Get Bigger, Stay the Same, or Sell Out?


“There are only two directions; you’re either growing or you’re dying. There ain’t no third direction.” (Tommy Callaghan, Sr. in “Tommy Boy”)




Business is a funny thing; one is never allowed to be satisfied. If you start a company, grow it, and begin to cash flow it, then that’s good, right? Isn’t that the idea? I thought it was, at least.



However, it really isn’t if you read the news, watch television, or attend any business group meetings. The things that people want to talk about are:



1. What are your growth figures in terms of revenue? Projected out to 2015?

2. Is your social media and digital strategy sound? Have you made the time and financial investments?

3. Have you thought about geographical expansion? Franchise? Office openings?



And on and on and on. There apparently isn’t any downtime allowed! If you sit pat, you’re destined to fail. You must reach for the stars of worldwide domination! The purpose of making money is to reinvest it! Get on it! Get bigger! Now!



So rapid growth is left as the only option, unless you want to be considered a “burned-out” property manager. If you choose to pursue slower, organic growth, you can be called “uninspired”, a “non-visionary”, and lazy. No one writes articles on business people who stay the course! Those stories got chopped out early in the editing room. But despite many loud naysayers to the contrary, staying the same is certainly a very viable option. It’s just the “keeping on, keeping on” strategy. Nothing is wrong with that!



But what about if you really are “uninspired” now? You are burned out! You are a property management company owner (or real estate agent) who doesn’t want to deal with the business anymore. You are looking to get out and sell out. How would you do this?



You could hire a business broker to find someone who wants to add property management to their real estate brokerage company, or just wants to own a stand-alone property management company. These instances are pretty rare and the business broker would truly be earning their money if they found someone who will buy your smaller firm (under $1M in revenues)!



What is more likely is that you would sell your management accounts to another property management firm. For example, I received a letter the other day from one of the largest property managers in town; this letter was undoubtedly sent to every property management company in the area. The letter asked to buy up the property management accounts we had.

In mergers & acquisitions speak, they were utilizing a typical roll-up strategy of buying up every smaller company in the area to accelerate their growth. They had no interest in our systems or procedures; they just wanted to throw our management clients into their management machine. This would be a fast way for them to grow rapidly. It also would be a quick way for “uninspired” property managers to get out of the business and make some quick money off of their company. A true win-win? Possibly!



To grow, stay, or go- it’s a personal decision that shouldn’t be the result of other’s expectations. There are options available no matter what you and your company’s strategy is!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, April 15, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Why Can’t Property Managers Guarantee How Long To Fill A Vacant Property?



Question from client: “How long will it take for you to fill my home with a tenant?”


Answer from property manager: “It should be in the next month or two, but I obviously can’t guarantee that.”

Comment from client: “Okay, I completely understand. I wouldn’t want you to speculate about the result of an action that you do for a living and your company has executed repeatedly well for the past 19 years (according to your ad).”



Question from hungry patron: “When will my eggs be ready?”

Answer from waiter: “It should be in the next 10–20 minutes, but I obviously can’t guarantee that because I’m not the cook.”

Comment from client: “You lazy imbecile! I’m starving- shake a leg! It should take 2 minutes- tops! Tell your guy back there to skip a smoke break and crack a couple eggs!”



What’s the difference? Clearly, it’s customer expectations. In some industries the expectations are really high, and in others it’s low. It’s just the way of the world.



So why don’t property managers guarantee the time it will take them to fill a rental property? Is it because they can’t (obviously)?



If you’re an experienced cook, you know approximately how long it takes to cook something. You’ve got to track down the ingredients, mix them up, and cook them for some length of time. It can be estimated (within a few minutes) of how long this will take. The “Guaranteed 10-Minute Breakfast or It’s Free” promotion should be easy to execute without giving away the farm.



The same should go for a property manager, right? If they know:

1. What time of the year it is

2. How fluid the current market is

3. The condition of the home

4. The rental price



It should be enough information for a tighter estimate of when to expect. There are just not that many variables to consider and factor in! So why are there no guarantees then? And why is it “so obvious” that a property manager could never give one?



Q. When will this basketball game be over?

A. Sometime today, but I obviously couldn’t guarantee that



Dominos Pizza did the “20 Minutes Guaranteed, or it’s Free” delivery promotion for years and they were able to pull it off with many more variables to consider (traffic, events going on in the city, number of orders, employees not showing up to work, weather, etc.).



So why not property managers? Are filling a home time guarantees a matter of can’t, or won’t?



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)

Friday, April 8, 2011

Charlotte Property Management Weekly: Rent-To-Sell Your Home? Best Time is Now



“Wow! How disingenuous! Could you think that because you create rent-to-sell transactions for living? Isn’t that like asking a barber if you need a haircut?”




At least that’s what I’d be asking as a reader. We live in a skeptical age, and that’s okay.



Let’s start with a story:



An average man meets a beautiful, energetic woman. He is taken. “If I could spend the rest of my life with her,” he thinks, “My life would be complete and I’d truly be happy! Just having her on my arm…” He knows he wants to marry her.



So why doesn’t he just ask her point blank? That answer is easy. She’d think he was crazy! She doesn’t know anything about him; and the one thing she knows is that he isn’t that attractive! There are much better suitors out there! So what does he do?



He courts her. He asks her on a date. He asks her on many dates. He buys her flowers, takes her to expensive restaurants, listens to her stories, compliments her, and tries to show that he is an amazing man. She doesn’t fall in love with him at first, but day by day, she grows fonder and fonder of him.



Then, sometime later in the future, when she is vested and knows (almost) everything about him, she professes her love. And, at that point, he knows he is close to getting what he has wanted since her first laid his eyes on her. He picks the right moment and proposes. And she says, “…Yes!”



I’ll take a short pause so you can collect yourself, grab some tissues, and kiss your spouse.



This story is just like rent-to-sell (okay, huge transition here!). Home owners want to sell their homes more than anything. Buyers are scarce and selling in a short time period for full price is almost impossible. Cheap flings (focus on “cheap”) are the rage as neighbors’ houses are being sold for half price (short sales and foreclosures). Home owners are desperate and have to give their homes away and accept the consequences of future damaged credit.



Home owners just want to sell their homes, much like the man just wants to get married. But, with this economy, the reality of that happening quickly on good terms is almost crazy. So what to do?



Rent-to-sell (placing rent-to-own tenants into vacant homes for sale) is the courtship process. These tenant-buyers get to live in the house, work on improving their credit scores, make the home improvements they want, and work on building up a down payment so that they can buy (when the time is right).

And why is it the best time now to rent-to-sell? This is simply because the banks will have to lend more money out in the future! This stagnant housing market is killing their earnings. They will need to find a way to jumpstart this part of the business by lending to responsible parties (aka like tenants who pay their rent on time for 1-3 years, have improved credit scores, and a nice down payment?).



The time to put rent-to-own tenants into vacant homes for sale (rent-to-sell) is now. When the tenants are ready to buy, the future market should be looking a lot better for successful (loan and sale) consummation!



Brett Furniss is the President & Owner of BDF Realty (“Charlotte’s Most Innovative Property Management & Investment Company”), and Rent-To-Sell Realty (“When You Need a New Solution to Sell Your Home”) which specialize in rent-to-own (lease options) and rent-to-sell homes. His newest book, A Real Estate Agent’s Complete Guide to Representing Rent-To-Own (Lease Option) Tenants (Delight Clients, Fill Vacant Homes, and Earn $2,250* Upfront! (*Minimum!)